An introduction to the processes of interpersonal relationships
and group dynamics that will be needed throughout the site visit.
Questions to ask your accreditation agency:
What are the agency's guidelines for running a meetings and interviews?
What techniques does the agency recommend to encourage participation
in meetings?
What happens to written team-member notes and self-study materials
after the visit?
During an on-site evaluation, team members will have multiple opportunities
to meet with groups and individuals at the host institution. The primary
purpose of these meetings is to provide the opportunity for individuals
to have input into the evaluation process through an open, collegial
dialogue. The objectives of the team include verifying statements
and impressions presented in written materials (self-study report,
supplemental information) or information from other meetings during
the on-site visit.
Team members are advised to be prepared for a wide variety of reactions
during meetings. These include everything from very quiet or withdrawn
behavior, requiring more probing on the part of team members, to very
assertive, aggressive behavior, requiring restraint or redirection
on the part of team members.
A meeting chair will be assigned for group meetings, to help assure
a structure and flow logically from one topic to the next. Each accreditation
agency may have its own, specific meeting procedures, but general
guidelines for team members include the following:
Prepare for meetings by learning about the committee's or meeting
participants' role in the institution and in preparing the self-study
report. This information will be included in the self-study materials,
but if not, request it. Be clear about what you would like to learn
from any meeting and develop lines of questions in advance to structure
the meeting appropriately.
Build a rapport with the meeting participants by:
Greeting them warmly
Taking 5 to 10 minutes for introductions.
Describe who you are, why you're there, and the specific
purpose for the meeting.
Where time permits, allow meeting participants to introduce
themselves, providing a brief overview of their backgrounds
and current interests and activities.
Setting the ground rules and establishing the available time
frame
Assuring participants that all remarks are confidential
Using appropriate titles when addressing participants
Giving your undivided attention throughout the session
Maintaining eye contact
Maintaining an open dialog
Emphasizing support from the agency
Facilitate a productive discussion with participants by:
Stressing the importance of the their contribution and input
Confirming the areas under evaluation
Describing relevant issues in context
Encouraging self assessment, comments and interpretations
Providing opportunities to discuss changes
Summarizing areas of agreement and disagreement
Encourage meeting participants to do 80% of the talking by having
questions in mind and using effective questioning techniques.
Pose open-ended questions that start with words like, "describe"
or "explain...."
When possible, ask "who," "what," "when,"
"where," "why," and "how" questions
instead of "yes"/"no" questions.
Avoid the urge to break the silence if participants are quiet.
Use silence to obtain more information by saying "take
your time... think about it."
Confirm information by asking similar questions in different
venues
Take notes, writing key words or phrases as you hear them to
help reconstruct the sessions.
Adhere to the schedule, but if serious issues come to light that
require adjusting it, make sure appropriate individuals at the institution
are informed.
A few minutes before the end of the meeting, ask participants
if they have closing questions for the team members.
Explain follow-up procedures.
Regardless of the interactions during the meeting, end on a positive
note.
Don't linger in the room after the meeting.
Some individuals may come to the meetings with supplemental documentation
and/or prepared presentations. In such cases, team members should
receive the information for transmittal to the entire team. Occasionally,
information is presented which is not germane to the work of the team;
when this occurs, team members are encouraged to move on to more relevant
issues as quickly and smoothly as possible.